Home | Search

2026-05-11

Run SaaS on user-controlled servers

Disclaimer

• Thinking aloud. May not endorse after more thought.
• See also: Moxie Marlinspike's post on why "users don't want to run their own servers, and never will."
• See also: Minimise lines of code to avoid being controlled, not to increase maintainability
• See also: Why I love open source

Main

• Has someone experimented with the following model: User rents a cloud server from hetzner/aws/etc, user issues an ssh key, user provides the key to the software provider, and the software provider then manages the server from there onwards. Only if there is a major issue, and the user is a power user (knows to operate a terminal, can copy-paste code from AI), then the user can take back control of the server and do what they wish.
• The user is basically guaranteed that they can get a disk snapshot anytime and recover their data (albeit with a lot of work), and they are basically guaranteed they can shut down the service anytime.
• This seems like a marginal improvement for user freedom as compared to the current model which is that the SaaS provider hosts it on their servers not yours.
• Examples: A startup could let non-technical users run self-hosted email this way, as opposed to using gmail. Notion (or a competitor) could let non-technical users host their own notes this way, instead of using Notion as it currently is.

Subscribe

Enter email or phone number to subscribe. You will receive atmost one update per month

Comment

Enter comment